Arbitrum vs Chainlink Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of ARB and LINK on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
ARB vs LINK Comparison Table
| Metric | ARB | LINK | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1003 | $8.70 | - |
| 24h Change | +0.12% | -4.57% | ARB |
| 24h Volume | $4.32M | $5.15M | LINK |
| Open Interest | $3.24M | $22.07M | LINK |
| Funding Rate (8h) | -0.0008% | +0.0013% | LINK |
| Annualized Funding | -0.83% | +1.37% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
ARB has a funding rate of -0.0008% (8h), while LINK sits at +0.0013% (8h).
LINK has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning longs are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in LINK.
Open Interest Context
ARB has $3.24M in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 0.75.LINK has $22.07M with a ratio of 4.29.
LINK has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
ARB traded $4.32M in the last 24 hours, while LINK traded $5.15M.
LINK is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore ARB
Explore LINK
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade ARB and LINK on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for ARB, LINK, and 100+ other perpetual markets.