Bitcoin vs Polygon Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of BTC and MATIC on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
BTC vs MATIC Comparison Table
| Metric | BTC | MATIC | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $65,439 | $0.3762 | - |
| 24h Change | -1.76% | +0.00% | MATIC |
| 24h Volume | $2.40B | $0 | BTC |
| Open Interest | $1.36B | $0 | BTC |
| Funding Rate (8h) | +0.0009% | +0.0000% | BTC |
| Annualized Funding | +1.04% | +0.00% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
BTC has a funding rate of +0.0009% (8h), while MATIC sits at +0.0000% (8h).
BTC has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning longs are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in BTC.
Open Interest Context
BTC has $1.36B in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 0.57.MATIC has $0 with a ratio of 0.00.
BTC has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
BTC traded $2.40B in the last 24 hours, while MATIC traded $0.
BTC is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore BTC
Explore MATIC
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade BTC and MATIC on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for BTC, MATIC, and 100+ other perpetual markets.