Chainlink vs Polygon Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of LINK and MATIC on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
LINK vs MATIC Comparison Table
| Metric | LINK | MATIC | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.02 | $0.3762 | - |
| 24h Change | -2.81% | +0.00% | MATIC |
| 24h Volume | $6.32M | $0 | LINK |
| Open Interest | $22.83M | $0 | LINK |
| Funding Rate (8h) | +0.0013% | +0.0000% | LINK |
| Annualized Funding | +1.37% | +0.00% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
LINK has a funding rate of +0.0013% (8h), while MATIC sits at +0.0000% (8h).
LINK has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning longs are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in LINK.
Open Interest Context
LINK has $22.83M in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 3.61.MATIC has $0 with a ratio of 0.00.
LINK has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
LINK traded $6.32M in the last 24 hours, while MATIC traded $0.
LINK is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore LINK
Explore MATIC
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade LINK and MATIC on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for LINK, MATIC, and 100+ other perpetual markets.