Arbitrum vs DOT Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of ARB and DOT on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
ARB vs DOT Comparison Table
| Metric | ARB | DOT | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1005 | $1.56 | - |
| 24h Change | +4.28% | +2.52% | ARB |
| 24h Volume | $4.01M | $7.92M | DOT |
| Open Interest | $3.49M | $12.54M | DOT |
| Funding Rate (8h) | -0.0028% | -0.0079% | DOT |
| Annualized Funding | -3.06% | -8.67% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
ARB has a funding rate of -0.0028% (8h), while DOT sits at -0.0079% (8h).
DOT has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning shorts are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in DOT.
Open Interest Context
ARB has $3.49M in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 0.87.DOT has $12.54M with a ratio of 1.58.
DOT has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
ARB traded $4.01M in the last 24 hours, while DOT traded $7.92M.
DOT is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore ARB
Explore DOT
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade ARB and DOT on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for ARB, DOT, and 100+ other perpetual markets.