Ethereum vs Polygon Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of ETH and MATIC on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
ETH vs MATIC Comparison Table
| Metric | ETH | MATIC | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,866.8 | $0.3762 | - |
| 24h Change | -4.54% | +0.00% | MATIC |
| 24h Volume | $1.05B | $0 | ETH |
| Open Interest | $1.12B | $0 | ETH |
| Funding Rate (8h) | -0.0002% | +0.0000% | ETH |
| Annualized Funding | -0.22% | +0.00% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
ETH has a funding rate of -0.0002% (8h), while MATIC sits at +0.0000% (8h).
ETH has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning shorts are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in ETH.
Open Interest Context
ETH has $1.12B in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 1.06.MATIC has $0 with a ratio of 0.00.
ETH has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
ETH traded $1.05B in the last 24 hours, while MATIC traded $0.
ETH is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore ETH
Explore MATIC
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade ETH and MATIC on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for ETH, MATIC, and 100+ other perpetual markets.