Polygon vs NEAR Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of MATIC and NEAR on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
MATIC vs NEAR Comparison Table
| Metric | MATIC | NEAR | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3762 | $1.09 | - |
| 24h Change | +0.00% | -3.33% | MATIC |
| 24h Volume | $0 | $3.03M | NEAR |
| Open Interest | $0 | $7.99M | NEAR |
| Funding Rate (8h) | +0.0000% | +0.0013% | NEAR |
| Annualized Funding | +0.00% | +1.37% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
MATIC has a funding rate of +0.0000% (8h), while NEAR sits at +0.0013% (8h).
NEAR has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning longs are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in NEAR.
Open Interest Context
MATIC has $0 in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 0.00.NEAR has $7.99M with a ratio of 2.64.
NEAR has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
MATIC traded $0 in the last 24 hours, while NEAR traded $3.03M.
NEAR is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore MATIC
Explore NEAR
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade MATIC and NEAR on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for MATIC, NEAR, and 100+ other perpetual markets.