NEAR vs Optimism Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of NEAR and OP on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
NEAR vs OP Comparison Table
| Metric | NEAR | OP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.14 | $0.1257 | - |
| 24h Change | +0.26% | +1.78% | OP |
| 24h Volume | $2.86M | $957.1K | NEAR |
| Open Interest | $7.76M | $3.55M | NEAR |
| Funding Rate (8h) | +0.0013% | -0.0027% | OP |
| Annualized Funding | +1.37% | -2.91% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
NEAR has a funding rate of +0.0013% (8h), while OP sits at -0.0027% (8h).
OP has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning shorts are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in OP.
Open Interest Context
NEAR has $7.76M in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 2.71.OP has $3.55M with a ratio of 3.71.
OP has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
NEAR traded $2.86M in the last 24 hours, while OP traded $957.1K.
NEAR is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore NEAR
Explore OP
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade NEAR and OP on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for NEAR, OP, and 100+ other perpetual markets.