Arbitrum vs Polygon Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of ARB and MATIC on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
ARB vs MATIC Comparison Table
| Metric | ARB | MATIC | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1008 | $0.3762 | - |
| 24h Change | +3.28% | +0.00% | ARB |
| 24h Volume | $4.00M | $0 | ARB |
| Open Interest | $3.48M | $0 | ARB |
| Funding Rate (8h) | -0.0014% | +0.0000% | ARB |
| Annualized Funding | -1.56% | +0.00% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
ARB has a funding rate of -0.0014% (8h), while MATIC sits at +0.0000% (8h).
ARB has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning shorts are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in ARB.
Open Interest Context
ARB has $3.48M in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 0.87.MATIC has $0 with a ratio of 0.00.
ARB has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
ARB traded $4.00M in the last 24 hours, while MATIC traded $0.
ARB is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore ARB
Explore MATIC
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade ARB and MATIC on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for ARB, MATIC, and 100+ other perpetual markets.