DOT vs NEAR Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of DOT and NEAR on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
DOT vs NEAR Comparison Table
| Metric | DOT | NEAR | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.61 | $1.14 | - |
| 24h Change | +0.92% | +0.58% | DOT |
| 24h Volume | $11.36M | $2.87M | DOT |
| Open Interest | $12.14M | $7.78M | DOT |
| Funding Rate (8h) | -0.0049% | +0.0013% | DOT |
| Annualized Funding | -5.32% | +1.37% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
DOT has a funding rate of -0.0049% (8h), while NEAR sits at +0.0013% (8h).
DOT has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning shorts are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in DOT.
Open Interest Context
DOT has $12.14M in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 1.07.NEAR has $7.78M with a ratio of 2.71.
NEAR has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
DOT traded $11.36M in the last 24 hours, while NEAR traded $2.87M.
DOT is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore DOT
Explore NEAR
Trading Tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade DOT and NEAR on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for DOT, NEAR, and 100+ other perpetual markets.