DOT vs Chainlink Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of DOT and LINK on Hyperliquid perpetual futures
DOT vs LINK Comparison Table
| Metric | DOT | LINK | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.60 | $8.63 | - |
| 24h Change | +0.83% | -5.14% | DOT |
| 24h Volume | $8.96M | $5.02M | DOT |
| Open Interest | $14.96M | $21.96M | LINK |
| Funding Rate (8h) | -0.0100% | +0.0013% | DOT |
| Annualized Funding | -10.96% | +1.37% | - |
Derivatives Comparison
Funding Rate Comparison
DOT has a funding rate of -0.0100% (8h), while LINK sits at +0.0013% (8h).
DOT has a higher absolute funding rate, meaning shorts are paying more to hold positions. This suggests stronger directional conviction in DOT.
Open Interest Context
DOT has $14.96M in open interest with an OI/Volume ratio of 1.67.LINK has $21.96M with a ratio of 4.37.
LINK has a higher OI/Volume ratio, indicating more sustained positions relative to trading activity. This typically means traders are holding longer-term directional bets.
Volume Context
DOT traded $8.96M in the last 24 hours, while LINK traded $5.02M.
DOT is more actively traded, which generally means tighter spreads, better execution, and lower slippage for traders. Higher volume also tends to reflect greater market interest and liquidity.
Quick Links
Explore DOT
Explore LINK
Trading Tools
Other Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Trade DOT and LINK on Beacon
Access real-time data, professional trading tools, and smart signals for DOT, LINK, and 100+ other perpetual markets.